PAUL SKENES EXTENSION
- Shane Linett

- 5 days ago
- 8 min read
Looking into why a 6 year deal for $120M might make sense for both the Pirates and Skenes
(Written in June 2025)

BACKGROUND
Since his debut in May 2024, Paul Skenes has quickly established himself as one of
Major League Baseball’s best pitchers. The 2023 first overall draft pick concluded his rookie
season with 23 starts, 133 innings pitched, an 11–3 record, 1.96 ERA, 0.95 WHIP, 170 strikeouts,
and a 2.44 FIP. His dominance earned him a list of accolades including the fifth rookie ever to
start an All-Star Game, All-MLB First Team honors, and the 2024 National League Rookie of
the Year Award, receiving 23 of 30 first-place votes. As of writing this on June 30, 2025, Skenes
is sustaining elite production in his second season, posting a 2.12 ERA, 0.91 WHIP, and 2.50 FIP
across 106 innings in 17 starts. In those 17 starts, he has pitched at least six innings and allowed
2 earned runs or fewer in 12 of those 17 outings.
With this level of performance comes a certain level of pay...eventually. Skenes currently
only has 1.00 years of service time and isn’t even arbitration eligible until after the 2026 season
as he will not qualify to be a super two after this season. This means the Pirates currently are
only paying him $875,000 in 2025. It’s rare to talk about extensions so early in a career,
particularly with flamethrowing pitchers who have a tendency to get hurt, but Skenes calls for an
exception.
PIRATES HISTORY
The likelihood of an extension, especially soon, isn’t in fact all that likely given the
Pirates’ historical spending trends. While Skenes has already swirled in premature trade
speculation, which was quickly shut down, the real obstacle lies in the club’s financial track
record. Pittsburgh is not known for issuing high-value contracts. The largest deal in franchise
history is the eight-year, $106.75 million extension given to Bryan Reynolds in 2023. Their
largest free-agent contract is the three-year, $39 million deal signed by Francisco Liriano in
2015. The Pirates have consistently operated with one of the lowest payrolls in baseball, ranking
in the bottom five every year since 2017—and never above the bottom third in any season since
2011. Nonetheless, given Skenes’ star trajectory and the value he represents, it's worth exploring
what a potential long-term extension could look like for one of baseball’s biggest superstars.
SIMILAR SITUATIONS
While no pitcher brings the exact combination of talent and marketability that Skenes
does, there are a few recent precedents for early-career extensions involving frontline arms:
Hunter Greene
The Cincinnati Reds signed flamethrower Hunter Greene to a six-year, $53 million
extension in April 2023, with a $21 million club option (or $2 million buyout) for 2029.
At the time, it was the largest pre-arbitration extension for a starting pitcher whose club
control ended at or before age 29, according to MLB.com's Mark Sheldon. The deal
covers all three arbitration years and one year of potential free agency, with a second free
agent year included if the option is exercised. Greene began to hit his stride and fulfill his
potential in 2024 and has carried that success into 2025, making the extension look like a
worthwhile move for the Reds.
Spencer Strider
In October 2022, as the Braves are known for, they locked up their young star early. The
Braves signed Strider to a six-year, $75 million deal with a $22 million club option (or $5
million buyout) for 2029. The contract covered two pre-arbitration seasons, all three
arbitration-eligible years, and one (potentially two) free agent seasons. Strider signed the
deal with 1.003 years of service time, nearly identical to Skenes’ current service clock,
and would hit free agency at age 30 if the option is not picked up.
These deals provide a useful framework for a potential Skenes extension, though any
negotiation would likely command a premium given his generational upside and early
dominance at the Major League level.
WHAT A POTENTIAL SKENES DEAL WOULD LOOK LIKE
Given his elite performance, frontline arsenal, and rare marketability, Skenes would
almost certainly command a significantly larger extension than any comparison. Any deal would
need to reflect both his generational talent and his potential long-term value to the franchise.
Traditional Structure
A potential extension for Paul Skenes could follow a traditional long-term model: a
6-year deal worth $120 million, including a $3 million signing bonus paid upfront. The contract
would also feature a club option for the 2032 season valued at $35 million, with a $6 million
buyout. To protect Skenes’ interests, the club option would convert to a player option if Skenes
spends fewer than 120 days on the injured list due to a right arm injury over the life of the deal.
The payout structure would be as follows and includes the following incentives:


Rationale
The proposed salary structure balances competitive precedent, service-time realities, and
market-based valuation. The low first-year salary of $2 million is designed to preserve the
industry norm that pre-arbitration players, known as "zero-to-threes", earn less than
arbitration-eligible counterparts. For the three arbitration years, salary figures were based on
historical record-setting numbers for each year of arbitration —adjusted to 2025 dollars and
rounded up:
Year 1 (Arb 1): Dallas Keuchel – $7.25M in 2016
Year 2 (Arb 2): Jake Arrieta – $10.7M in 2016
Year 3 (Arb 3): Jacob deGrom – $17M in 2019
The $30 million annual salary in the free agency years places Skenes among the
highest-paid starting pitchers on the open market, aligning his value with current top-tier free
agent comparables. The $3 million signing bonus and $6 million buyout bring the total
guaranteed value to a clean $120 million, while also offering Skenes meaningful upfront
financial security. Lastly, the clause converting the 2032 club option into a player option if
Skenes spends less than 120 days on the injured list due to a right arm injury mirrors language
used in Garrett Crochet’s deal with the Red Sox, which includes a similar trigger tied to left arm
injuries. This addition provides a player-friendly mechanism without fully removing team
control in later years.
Why This Makes Sense for the Pirates
From the team’s perspective, the proposed structure requires a substantial early
investment—an inherent risk when committing long term to a high-velocity pitcher. However,
the primary upside is the ability to gain team control over up to three would-be free agent years,
thanks to the inclusion of buyouts in years one and two of would-be free agency, and a club
option for a potential third. While the free agent-year salaries of $30M, $30M, and $35M may
appear steep in a vacuum, they are reasonable relative to the current starting pitcher market. If
Skenes continues at his current trajectory, he could legitimately challenge the all-time average
annual value (AAV) record for a starting pitcher of $43.3M, set by Max Scherzer and Justin
Verlander. By the time Skenes reaches free agency in 2030, that figure could rise even higher due
to market inflation and what would be his young age of 27 at the time of signing a deal. As of
2025, five active pitchers have AAVs of $35M or more, and Skenes has already positioned
himself as a top-five arm in MLB no matter how you look at it. Securing his first three free agent
seasons at $30M, $30M, and $35M could ultimately be viewed as a win for the team, especially
when considering the club has the flexibility to decline the final option year for just $6 million if
performance declines. Using ZiPS projections, Skenes is expected to produce approximately 4
WAR per season over the next three years. If that level of performance holds over the life of the
contract—spanning his prime years from ages 24 to 29—he would generate approximately 24
WAR across six seasons. With teams spending an average of $8 million per WAR during the
2024–2025 offseason, that level of production would carry a market value of $192 million. The
proposed deal at $120 million would therefore represent a $70 million surplus in value, offering
the team significant financial efficiency. This makes sense given that he is still pre-arbitration
eligible for another season. Additionally, this deal would allow the Pirates to avoid the arbitration
process entirely, avoiding a potentially contentious process where clubs are often forced to
diminish a player's value in a hearing to keep costs down. For a generational talent like Skenes,
preserving a positive long-term relationship may be just as important as the financial terms.
Finally, such a contract would represent the largest guaranteed commitment in franchise history,
sending a clear message to fans about their desire to win and build around their young stars.
Why This Makes Sense for Skenes
From Skenes’ side, the most obvious benefit is the guarantee along with setting a
precedent. This would shatter Strider’s record for an extension for a pitcher with under 4 years of
service time in terms of both total guarantee and AAV. Additionally in terms of length, Skenes
will be a free agent at age 29 going into his age 30 season, or at 30 going into his age 31 season
depending on if the option is picked up. This would still allow him to be in his prime years for
the front end of a new deal and be able to sign a long term 6-8 or even up to a 10 year deal. He is
not losing out on being able to sign a large free agent deal. Corbin Burnes, at age 30, signed for 6
years and $210M. Max Fried, at age 31, was able to sign an 8 year $218M deal. So it is certainly
possible to sign a big contract at age 30 or 31 for a starting pitcher. Additionally, the highest total
payment over 3 years of arbitration for a starting pitcher is just over $32M set by Corbin Burnes.
Pitchers are known to get notably less than hitters in arbitration. Assuming an absolute best case
scenario, yet unlikely, from the player point of view, assume Skenes breaks Burnes’ record in
arbitration totalling $35M, signs signs for an all-time record AAV of $45M in what would be
first two years of free agency, and tack on roughly $2M for the year of pre-arbitration, that would
total $127M—again in an absolute perfect world for the player. Thus, the extension makes sense
in terms of total value as opposed to going year by year as it would be completely guaranteed
nearly the same amount.
FINAL THOUGHTS
It is in the best interest of both the Pirates and Skenes to come together on a contract
agreement and avoid the eventual arbitration process altogether. Should it come down to
arbitration, and it makes it to a hearing, it does nothing but damage relationships between players
and teams. The deal makes plenty of sense from their point of view locking down a superstar in
their prime years. They gain up to 3 extra years of control for what would most likely be below
market value price and most importantly, signal to fans their commitment to winning. It would
be up to Skenes to decide on his willingness to give up free agent years. The Pirates could look
to defer money as well. This would come a bigger headline number though and to put a similar
deal with heavy deferrals the structure could look something like:

The highest ever extension for a starting pitcher during their arbitration eligible years was
this past offseason when Garret Crochet signed a 6 year deal worth $170M after getting traded to
the Red Sox. Skenes is still over a full season away from even entering his arbitration years and
he would have tied that number in total value thus making this something he might be interested
in. Skenes would also be guaranteed to reach free agency prior to his age 30 season, allowing
him to sign a new big free agent contract at the age of 29 still in his prime years, while getting
paid from the Pirates still. Skenes would be getting paid by the Pirates through age 36. Another
option for the Pirates would be to make Skenes a Pirate for life and offer a long term megadeal,
however this is extremely uncommon for pitchers given injury risk, and more frequent with
position players. The only active pitchers in today’s game with contracts longer than 7 years are
Max Fried and Gerrit Cole of the Yankees and Yoshinobu Yamamoto of the Dodgers. Skenes
would presumably not sign either given the Pirates recent lack of winning and investment in the
team, as well as players’ overall desire to reach free agency at a reasonable age. So at this time, a
mega-deal wouldn’t make too much sense for either side, rather the traditional structure buying
out his first 2 free agent years with a club option for the third makes tremendous sense for both
parties involved.



Comments